Information service
25 Manufacturing engineering
New standards
EVS-EN 4877-001:2024
Aerospace series - Filler metals for welding - Part 001: Technical specification
Scope:
This document specifies the requirements for the ordering, manufacture, testing, inspection and delivery of all forms of filler metal. It is presupposed to be applied when referred to and in conjunction with the product procurement specification unless otherwise specified on the drawing, order or inspection schedule.
Base documents:
EN 4877-001:2024
Replaces:
EVS-EN 3879:2023
EVS-EN IEC 61784-5-22:2024
Industrial networks - Profiles - Part 5-22: Installation of fieldbuses - Installation profiles for CPF 22
Scope:
IEC 61784-5-22:2024 specifies the installation profile for CPF 22 (AUTBUSTM [1]).
The installation profile is specified in Annex A. This annex is read in conjunction with IEC 61918:2018, IEC 61918:2018/AMD1:2022 and IEC 61918:2018/AMD2:2024.
[1] AUTBUSTM is the trade name of the Kyland Technology Co., Ltd. This information is given for the convenience of users of this document and does not constitute an endorsement by IEC of the trademark holder or any of its products. Compliance does not require use of the trade name. Use of the trade name requires permission of Kyland Technology Co., Ltd.
The installation profile is specified in Annex A. This annex is read in conjunction with IEC 61918:2018, IEC 61918:2018/AMD1:2022 and IEC 61918:2018/AMD2:2024.
[1] AUTBUSTM is the trade name of the Kyland Technology Co., Ltd. This information is given for the convenience of users of this document and does not constitute an endorsement by IEC of the trademark holder or any of its products. Compliance does not require use of the trade name. Use of the trade name requires permission of Kyland Technology Co., Ltd.
Base documents:
IEC 61784-5-22:2024; EN IEC 61784-5-22:2024
EVS-EN IEC 61918:2018/A2:2024
Industrial communication networks - Installation of communication networks in industrial premises
Scope:
Amendment to EN IEC 61918:2018
Base documents:
IEC 61918:2018/AMD2:2024; EN IEC 61918:2018/A2:2024
EVS-EN ISO/ASTM 52943-2:2024
Additive manufacturing for aerospace - Process characteristics and performance - Part 2: Directed energy deposition using wire and arc (ISO/ASTM 52943-2:2024)
Scope:
This document specifies requirements for the additive manufacturing of metallic parts with directed energy deposition (DED) in the aerospace industry.
Within the application scope of this document, wire is used as feedstock, and arc processes (gas-shielded metal arc processes (MIG/MAG/GMAW), tungsten inert gas processes (TIG/GTAW), plasma arc processes (PAW)) are used as the main energy source.
This document is to be used in conjunction with the engineering documents, if required by the engineering authority.
This document does not address health and safety issues.
Within the application scope of this document, wire is used as feedstock, and arc processes (gas-shielded metal arc processes (MIG/MAG/GMAW), tungsten inert gas processes (TIG/GTAW), plasma arc processes (PAW)) are used as the main energy source.
This document is to be used in conjunction with the engineering documents, if required by the engineering authority.
This document does not address health and safety issues.
Base documents:
ISO/ASTM 52943-2:2024; EN ISO/ASTM 52943-2:2024
EVS-EN 13523-22:2024
Coil coated metals - Test methods - Part 22: Colour difference - Visual comparison
Scope:
This document specifies the procedure for determining the difference in the colour of an organic coating on a metallic substrate by visual comparison against a standard using either diffuse natural daylight or artificial daylight in a standard booth.
NOTE Results can differ between natural and artificial daylight.
It might be that two colour specimens will match in daylight but not under another light source. This phenomenon is known as metamerism (see EN 13523 3).
If a metameric match is to be reported in objective terms, spectrophotometric measurements (using CIE Standard Illuminants D65 and A) can be made, in accordance with EN 13523 3.
No statement is made about either the precision or the accuracy of this procedure since the results derived are neither in numerical form nor do they provide a pass/fail evaluation in objective terms. Therefore, this procedure is only intended to be used where the use of colour measuring instruments is not recommendable (evaluation of colour matches, inspection of metallic colours, etc.).
The standardization of such visual comparisons, by light sources, illuminating and viewing geometry and specimen size, provides for improved uniformity of results. This practice is essential for critical colour matching and is highly recommended for colour inspections.
NOTE Results can differ between natural and artificial daylight.
It might be that two colour specimens will match in daylight but not under another light source. This phenomenon is known as metamerism (see EN 13523 3).
If a metameric match is to be reported in objective terms, spectrophotometric measurements (using CIE Standard Illuminants D65 and A) can be made, in accordance with EN 13523 3.
No statement is made about either the precision or the accuracy of this procedure since the results derived are neither in numerical form nor do they provide a pass/fail evaluation in objective terms. Therefore, this procedure is only intended to be used where the use of colour measuring instruments is not recommendable (evaluation of colour matches, inspection of metallic colours, etc.).
The standardization of such visual comparisons, by light sources, illuminating and viewing geometry and specimen size, provides for improved uniformity of results. This practice is essential for critical colour matching and is highly recommended for colour inspections.
Base documents:
EN 13523-22:2024
Replaces:
EVS-EN 13523-22:2017
EVS-EN 13523-12:2024
Coil coated metals - Test methods - Part 12: Resistance to scratching
Scope:
This document specifies the procedure for determining the resistance of an organic coating on a metallic substrate to penetration by scratching with a needle.
It is possible that with some aluminium alloys and thin gauge steel substrate below 0,4 mm, that rather than scratching, the needle will deform the substrate. Under these conditions, this test method is not applicable.
Soft coatings such as poly vinyl chloride (PVC) and structured coatings will not give a precise result due to the soft nature of the coating and/or the potential for the needle to snag.
The method is not applicable to conductive coatings.
It is possible that with some aluminium alloys and thin gauge steel substrate below 0,4 mm, that rather than scratching, the needle will deform the substrate. Under these conditions, this test method is not applicable.
Soft coatings such as poly vinyl chloride (PVC) and structured coatings will not give a precise result due to the soft nature of the coating and/or the potential for the needle to snag.
The method is not applicable to conductive coatings.
Base documents:
EN 13523-12:2024
Replaces:
EVS-EN 13523-12:2017
EVS-EN 13523-1:2024
Coil coated metals - Test methods - Part 1: Film thickness
Scope:
This document specifies the procedures for determining the dry-film thickness of an organic coating on a metallic substrate (coil coating).
Five appropriate methods are given in this document:
a) magnetic induction;
b) eddy current;
c) micrometer;
d) optical;
e) ruggedized optical interference.
The methods are applicable only to products with smooth and flat substrates, but the coating itself can be textured. In that case, for methods a) and b), the average of a series of readings will represent an average of the thickness of the organic coating, while method c) will give the maximum thickness, method d) can provide the minimum, maximum and average thickness, and e) will give the total thickness.
Non-destructive continuous-web methods on measurement of dry-film thickness are only applicable on method a).
Five appropriate methods are given in this document:
a) magnetic induction;
b) eddy current;
c) micrometer;
d) optical;
e) ruggedized optical interference.
The methods are applicable only to products with smooth and flat substrates, but the coating itself can be textured. In that case, for methods a) and b), the average of a series of readings will represent an average of the thickness of the organic coating, while method c) will give the maximum thickness, method d) can provide the minimum, maximum and average thickness, and e) will give the total thickness.
Non-destructive continuous-web methods on measurement of dry-film thickness are only applicable on method a).
Base documents:
EN 13523-1:2024
Replaces:
EVS-EN 13523-1:2017
EVS-EN 13523-3:2024
Coil coated metals - Test methods - Part 3: Colour difference and metamerism - Instrumental comparison
Scope:
This document specifies procedures for determining the instrumental colour difference (CIELAB or ) of an organic coating on a metallic substrate compared to another one used as a reference (usually called reference) and the metamerism depending on the illuminant.
When two colour specimens have identical spectral reflectance curves, they are matching under any illuminant irrespective of its spectral characteristics. This is termed a “spectral match”. It is also possible for two colour specimens having different spectral reflectance curves to match visually under a given light source but not to match under another light source with different spectral characteristics; such matches are termed "metameric".
One quantitative description of metamerism is the so-called "metamerism index".
Information on the metamerism index is of limited value where ΔE (instrumental colour difference for a given illuminant) is > 0,5. The metamerism index is not suited for determining the absolute colour difference or colour consistency of a given specimen at change of illuminant.
The colour difference under the reference illuminant is to be measured in colour coordinates L*, a* and b*.
Excluded from this method are organic coatings producing fluorescence and/or which are multicoloured, pearlescent or metallic.
Establishing a reference as well as the magnitude of an acceptable colour difference are not covered by this method.
Two methods are given in this document:
a) instrumental colour difference measurement using a tristimulus colourimeter;
b) instrumental colour difference measurement using a spectrophotometer or equivalent.
It is advised that care is taken when measuring e.g.
- textured surfaces;
- fluorescent coatings;
- metameric coatings;
- multi-coloured, pearlescent, metallic or special colour effect coatings.
When two colour specimens have identical spectral reflectance curves, they are matching under any illuminant irrespective of its spectral characteristics. This is termed a “spectral match”. It is also possible for two colour specimens having different spectral reflectance curves to match visually under a given light source but not to match under another light source with different spectral characteristics; such matches are termed "metameric".
One quantitative description of metamerism is the so-called "metamerism index".
Information on the metamerism index is of limited value where ΔE (instrumental colour difference for a given illuminant) is > 0,5. The metamerism index is not suited for determining the absolute colour difference or colour consistency of a given specimen at change of illuminant.
The colour difference under the reference illuminant is to be measured in colour coordinates L*, a* and b*.
Excluded from this method are organic coatings producing fluorescence and/or which are multicoloured, pearlescent or metallic.
Establishing a reference as well as the magnitude of an acceptable colour difference are not covered by this method.
Two methods are given in this document:
a) instrumental colour difference measurement using a tristimulus colourimeter;
b) instrumental colour difference measurement using a spectrophotometer or equivalent.
It is advised that care is taken when measuring e.g.
- textured surfaces;
- fluorescent coatings;
- metameric coatings;
- multi-coloured, pearlescent, metallic or special colour effect coatings.
Base documents:
EN 13523-3:2024
Replaces:
EVS-EN 13523-3:2021
EVS-EN 13523-29:2024
Coil coated metals - Test methods - Part 29: Resistance to environmental soiling (Dirt pick-up and striping)
Scope:
This part of the EN 13523 series specifies a procedure for the comparative evaluation of resistance to soiling of an organic coating on a metallic substrate (coil coating) in an outdoor exposure environment, particularly the soiling defect known as "Tiger stripes".
Base documents:
EN 13523-29:2024
Replaces:
EVS-EN 13523-29:2017
EVS-EN 13523-21:2024
Coil coated metals - Test methods - Part 21: Evaluation of outdoor exposed panels
Scope:
This part of the EN 13523 series specifies the procedure for evaluating the behaviour of an organic coating on a metallic substrate during and after outdoor exposure. Panel design, preparation and the procedure for outdoor exposure are performed in accordance with EN 13523 19.
After washing of the panel, some dirt can remain on the panel. This remaining dirt can influence the accuracy and precision of readings of gloss and colour, performed on exposed panels, although carried out in accordance with the standards. Unlike other precise measurements, the objective of this European Standard is to report on trends in the corrosion and/or paint degradation behaviour of coil coated panels.
After washing of the panel, some dirt can remain on the panel. This remaining dirt can influence the accuracy and precision of readings of gloss and colour, performed on exposed panels, although carried out in accordance with the standards. Unlike other precise measurements, the objective of this European Standard is to report on trends in the corrosion and/or paint degradation behaviour of coil coated panels.
Base documents:
EN 13523-21:2024
Replaces:
EVS-EN 13523-21:2017
EVS-EN 13523-8:2024
Coil coated metals - Test methods - Part 8: Resistance to salt spray (fog)
Scope:
This part of The EN 13523 series specifies the procedures for determining the resistance to salt spray (fog) of an organic coating on a metallic substrate (coil coating).
For steel, neutral salt spray (fog) is usually used, and for aluminium, acetic acid salt spray (fog).
For steel, neutral salt spray (fog) is usually used, and for aluminium, acetic acid salt spray (fog).
Base documents:
EN 13523-8:2024
Replaces:
EVS-EN 13523-8:2017
EVS-EN 13523-10:2024
Coil coated metals - Test methods - Part 10: Resistance to fluorescent UV radiation and water condensation
Scope:
This part of the EN 13523 series specifies the basic principles and procedure for determining the resistance of an organic coating on a metallic substrate (coil coating) to a combination of fluorescent UV radiation, and water condensation and temperature under controlled conditions.
Due to varied conditions which occur during natural weathering and the extreme nature of accelerated testing, correlation between the two cannot be expected.
Not all organic coatings will perform on an equal basis but a degree of correlation between the same generic type might be observed.
Due to varied conditions which occur during natural weathering and the extreme nature of accelerated testing, correlation between the two cannot be expected.
Not all organic coatings will perform on an equal basis but a degree of correlation between the same generic type might be observed.
Base documents:
EN 13523-10:2024
Replaces:
EVS-EN 13523-10:2017
EVS-EN ISO 15610:2024
Specification and qualification of welding procedures for metallic materials - Qualification based on tested welding consumables (ISO 15610:2024)
Scope:
This document specifies how a welding procedure can be qualified by using tested welding consumable data. It expands on the requirements given in ISO 15607.
In addition, it gives the range of qualification.
Application of this document is limited to parent material groups 1.1, 8.1, 21, 22.1 and 22.2 in accordance with ISO/TR 15608, which produce acceptable microstructures and properties in the heat-affected zone which do not deteriorate significantly in service.
This document is limited to:
— butt welds and fillet welds in material of thicknesses t ≤ 40 mm (groups 1.1 and 8.1) and t ≤ 20 mm (groups 21, 22.1 and 22.2);
— fillet welds with throat thickness a ≥ 1 mm.
This document is not applicable when any of the following is specified for the welded joint:
a) hardness;
b) impact properties;
c) preheating;
d) controlled heat input;
e) interpass temperature;
f) post-weld heat treatment.
The use of this document can also be restricted by an application standard, specification or other documents.
Base documents:
ISO 15610:2024; EN ISO 15610:2024
Replaces:
EVS-EN ISO 15610:2023
ISO/ASTM 52943-2:2024
Additive manufacturing for aerospace — Process characteristics and performance — Part 2: Directed energy deposition using wire and arc
Scope:
This document specifies requirements for the additive manufacturing of metallic parts with directed energy deposition (DED) in the aerospace industry.
Within the application scope of this document, wire is used as feedstock, and arc processes (gas-shielded metal arc processes (MIG/MAG/GMAW), tungsten inert gas processes (TIG/GTAW), plasma arc processes (PAW)) are used as the main energy source.
This document is to be used in conjunction with the engineering documents, if required by the engineering authority.
This document does not address health and safety issues.
Within the application scope of this document, wire is used as feedstock, and arc processes (gas-shielded metal arc processes (MIG/MAG/GMAW), tungsten inert gas processes (TIG/GTAW), plasma arc processes (PAW)) are used as the main energy source.
This document is to be used in conjunction with the engineering documents, if required by the engineering authority.
This document does not address health and safety issues.
Base documents:
IEC 61784-3:2021/AMD1:2024
Amendment 1 - Industrial communication networks - Profiles - Part 3: Functional safety fieldbuses - General rules and profile definitions
Scope:
Base documents:
IEC 61784-3:2021+AMD1:2024 CSV
Industrial communication networks - Profiles - Part 3: Functional safety fieldbuses - General rules and profile definitions
Scope:
IEC 61784-3:2021+AMD1:2024 CSV explains some common principles that can be used in the transmission of safety-relevant messages among participants within a distributed network which use fieldbus technology in accordance with the requirements of IEC 61508 (all parts) for functional safety. These principles are based on the black channel approach. They can be used in various industrial applications such as process control, manufacturing automation and machinery.
Base documents:
ISO 3677:2024
Filler metal for brazing - Designation
Scope:
This document specifies designations for filler materials for brazing on the basis of their chemical composition. The designation includes their solidus/liquidus temperatures. This document applies to the metallic part of filler materials used in brazing products, for example foils, wires, rods, pastes, flux-coated rods or wires and flux-cored rods or wires.
Base documents:
Replaces:
ISO 3677:2016
CWA 18106:2024
Circularity Protocols for extending the useful Life of Large Industrial Equipment
Scope:
Applying the concepts of Digital Twin and virtual simulations, the CWA describes a set of protocols for modernising, diagnosing, inspecting, repairing, disassembling, upgrading, refurbishing, remanufacturing, recycling and reassembly and testing of Large Industrial Equipment. The CWA will provide a formal Protocols Specifications Document (PSD), specifying for each protocol unambiguously steps, processes, deployment requirements and conditions, etc.
The development of a CWA, based on the consensus of the parties, is the most suitable tool to provide policymakers and all interested stakeholders with a guide, a reference document which, although not binding, will act as a catalyst for further documents, proposals and future European projects.
This workshop is created under the currently ongoing LEVEL-UP project (Grant Agreement # 869991) which is carried out in the framework of Horizon 2020.
The development of a CWA, based on the consensus of the parties, is the most suitable tool to provide policymakers and all interested stakeholders with a guide, a reference document which, although not binding, will act as a catalyst for further documents, proposals and future European projects.
This workshop is created under the currently ongoing LEVEL-UP project (Grant Agreement # 869991) which is carried out in the framework of Horizon 2020.
Base documents:
CWA 18106:2024
ISO 17672:2024
Brazing — Filler metals
Scope:
This document specifies the compositional ranges of a series of filler metals used for brazing. The filler metals are divided into seven classes, related to their composition but not necessarily to the major element present.
NOTE 1 For the major element(s) present, see Annex A.
In the case of composite products, such as flux-coated rods, pastes or plastics tapes, this document covers only the filler metal that forms parts of such products. The melting temperatures given in the tables are only approximate, as they necessarily vary within the compositional range of the filler metal. Therefore, they are given only for information. Technical delivery conditions are given for brazing filler metals and products containing brazing filler metals with other constituents such as flux and/or binders.
NOTE 2 For some applications, such as precious metal jewellery, aerospace and dental, filler metals other than those included in this document are often used. These are covered by other International Standards to which reference can be made.
NOTE 1 For the major element(s) present, see Annex A.
In the case of composite products, such as flux-coated rods, pastes or plastics tapes, this document covers only the filler metal that forms parts of such products. The melting temperatures given in the tables are only approximate, as they necessarily vary within the compositional range of the filler metal. Therefore, they are given only for information. Technical delivery conditions are given for brazing filler metals and products containing brazing filler metals with other constituents such as flux and/or binders.
NOTE 2 For some applications, such as precious metal jewellery, aerospace and dental, filler metals other than those included in this document are often used. These are covered by other International Standards to which reference can be made.
Base documents:
Replaces:
ISO 17672:2016
Standard package 7:2024-05-02
Welding - Specification and qualification of procedures
Scope:
Base documents:
Replaced standards
EVS-EN 13523-1:2017
Coil coated metals - Test methods - Part 1: Film thickness
Scope:
This part of the EN 13523 series specifies the procedures for determining the dry-film thickness of an organic coating on a metallic substrate (coil coating).
Four appropriate methods are given in this European Standard:
a) magnetic induction;
b) eddy current;
c) micrometer;
d) optical.
The methods are applicable only to products with smooth and flat substrates but the coating itself may be textured. In that case, for methods a) and b) the average of a series of readings will represent an average of the thickness of the organic coating, while method c) will give the maximum thickness and method d) can provide the minimum, maximum and average thickness.
Non-destructive continuous-web methods on measurement of dry-film thickness (see EN ISO 2808) are not dealt with.
Four appropriate methods are given in this European Standard:
a) magnetic induction;
b) eddy current;
c) micrometer;
d) optical.
The methods are applicable only to products with smooth and flat substrates but the coating itself may be textured. In that case, for methods a) and b) the average of a series of readings will represent an average of the thickness of the organic coating, while method c) will give the maximum thickness and method d) can provide the minimum, maximum and average thickness.
Non-destructive continuous-web methods on measurement of dry-film thickness (see EN ISO 2808) are not dealt with.
Base documents:
EN 13523-1:2017
Replaced:
EVS-EN 13523-1:2024
EVS-EN 13523-10:2017
Coil coated metals - Test methods - Part 10: Resistance to fluorescent UV radiation and water condensation
Scope:
This part of the EN 13523 series specifies the basic principles and procedure for determining the resistance of an organic coating on a metallic substrate (coil coating) to a combination of fluorescent UV radiation, and water condensation and temperature under controlled conditions.
Due to varied conditions which occur during natural weathering and the extreme nature of accelerated testing, correlation between the two cannot be expected.
Not all organic coatings will perform on an equal basis but a degree of correlation between the same generic type might be observed.
Due to varied conditions which occur during natural weathering and the extreme nature of accelerated testing, correlation between the two cannot be expected.
Not all organic coatings will perform on an equal basis but a degree of correlation between the same generic type might be observed.
Base documents:
EN 13523-10:2017
Replaced:
EVS-EN 13523-10:2024
EVS-EN 13523-22:2017
Coil coated metals - Test methods - Part 22: Colour difference - Visual comparison
Scope:
This part of the EN 13523 series specifies the procedure for determining the difference in the colour of an organic coating on a metallic substrate by visual comparison against a standard using either diffuse natural daylight or artificial daylight in a standard booth.
NOTE Results might differ between natural and artificial daylight.
It might be that two colour specimens will match in daylight but not under another light source. This phenomenon is known as metamerism (see EN 13523 15).
If a metameric match is to be reported in objective terms, spectrophotometric measurements (using CIE Standard Illuminants D65 and A) should be made, in accordance with EN 13523-15.
No statement is made about either the precision or the accuracy of this procedure since the results derived are neither in numerical form nor do they provide a pass/fail evaluation in objective terms. Therefore, this procedure should only be used where the use of colour measuring instruments is not recommendable (evaluation of colour matches, inspection of metallic colours, etc.).
The standardization of such visual comparisons, by light sources, illuminating and viewing geometry and specimen size, provides for improved uniformity of results. This practice is essential for critical colour matching and is highly recommended for colour inspections.
NOTE Results might differ between natural and artificial daylight.
It might be that two colour specimens will match in daylight but not under another light source. This phenomenon is known as metamerism (see EN 13523 15).
If a metameric match is to be reported in objective terms, spectrophotometric measurements (using CIE Standard Illuminants D65 and A) should be made, in accordance with EN 13523-15.
No statement is made about either the precision or the accuracy of this procedure since the results derived are neither in numerical form nor do they provide a pass/fail evaluation in objective terms. Therefore, this procedure should only be used where the use of colour measuring instruments is not recommendable (evaluation of colour matches, inspection of metallic colours, etc.).
The standardization of such visual comparisons, by light sources, illuminating and viewing geometry and specimen size, provides for improved uniformity of results. This practice is essential for critical colour matching and is highly recommended for colour inspections.
Base documents:
EN 13523-22:2017
Replaced:
EVS-EN 13523-22:2024
EVS-EN 13523-29:2017
Coil coated metals - Test methods - Part 29: Resistance to environmental soiling (Dirt pick-up and striping)
Scope:
This part of the EN 13523 series specifies a procedure for the comparative evaluation of resistance to soiling of an organic coating on a metallic substrate (coil coating) in an outdoor exposure environment, particularly the soiling defect known as "Tiger stripes".
Base documents:
EN 13523-29:2017
Replaced:
EVS-EN 13523-29:2024
EVS-EN 13523-12:2017
Coil coated metals - Test methods - Part 12: Resistance to scratching
Scope:
This part of the EN 13523 series describes the procedure for determining the resistance of an organic coating on a metallic substrate to penetration by scratching with a needle.
It is possible that with some aluminium alloys and thin gauge steel substrate below 0,4 mm, that rather than scratching, the needle will deform the substrate. Under these conditions, this test method is not applicable.
Soft coatings such as poly vinyl chloride (PVC) and structured coatings will not give a precise result due to the soft nature of the coating and/or the potential for the needle to snag.
The method is not applicable to conductive coatings.
It is possible that with some aluminium alloys and thin gauge steel substrate below 0,4 mm, that rather than scratching, the needle will deform the substrate. Under these conditions, this test method is not applicable.
Soft coatings such as poly vinyl chloride (PVC) and structured coatings will not give a precise result due to the soft nature of the coating and/or the potential for the needle to snag.
The method is not applicable to conductive coatings.
Base documents:
EN 13523-12:2017
Replaced:
EVS-EN 13523-12:2024
EVS-EN 13523-8:2017
Coil coated metals - Test methods - Part 8: Resistance to salt spray (fog)
Scope:
This part of The EN 13523 series specifies the procedures for determining the resistance to salt spray (fog) of an organic coating on a metallic substrate (coil coating).
For steel, neutral salt spray (fog) is usually used, and for aluminium, acetic acid salt spray (fog).
For steel, neutral salt spray (fog) is usually used, and for aluminium, acetic acid salt spray (fog).
Base documents:
EN 13523-8:2017
Replaced:
EVS-EN 13523-8:2024
ISO 3677:2016
Filler metal for soldering and brazing -- Designation
Scope:
ISO 3677:2016 specifies designations for filler materials for soldering and brazing, on the basis of their chemical composition. For brazing materials only, the designation includes their solidus/liquidus temperatures. This International Standard deals with the metallic part of filler materials used in soldering and brazing products, e.g. foils, wires, rods, pastes, flux coated rods/wires, flux cored rods/wires, etc.
Base documents:
Replaced:
ISO 3677:2024
EVS-EN 13523-3:2021
Coil coated metals - Test methods - Part 3: Colour difference and metamerism - Instrumental comparison
Scope:
This document specifies procedures for determining the instrumental colour difference (CIELAB) of an organic coating on a metallic substrate compared to another one used as a reference (usually called reference) and the metamerism depending on the illuminant.
When two colour specimens have identical spectral reflectance curves, they are matching under any illuminant irrespective of its spectral characteristics. This is termed a “spectral match”. It is also possible for two colour specimens having different spectral reflectance curves to match visually under a given light source but not to match under another light source with different spectral characteristics; such matches are termed “metameric”.
One quantitative description of metamerism is the so-called “metamerism index”.
Information on the metamerism index is of limited value where ΔE (instrumental colour difference for a given illuminant) is > 0,5. The metamerism index is not suited for determining the absolute colour difference or colour consistency of a given specimen at change of illuminant.
The colour difference under the reference illuminant is to be measured in colour coordinates L*, a* and b*.
Excluded from this method are organic coatings producing fluorescence and/or which are multicoloured, pearlescent or metallic.
Establishing a reference as well as the magnitude of an acceptable colour difference are not covered by this method.
Two methods are given in this document:
a) instrumental colour difference measurement using a tristimulus colourimeter;
b) instrumental colour difference measurement using a spectrophotometer or equivalent.
It is advised that care is taken when measuring e.g.
— textured surfaces;
— fluorescent coatings;
— metameric coatings;
— multi-coloured, pearlescent, metallic or special colour effect coatings.
When two colour specimens have identical spectral reflectance curves, they are matching under any illuminant irrespective of its spectral characteristics. This is termed a “spectral match”. It is also possible for two colour specimens having different spectral reflectance curves to match visually under a given light source but not to match under another light source with different spectral characteristics; such matches are termed “metameric”.
One quantitative description of metamerism is the so-called “metamerism index”.
Information on the metamerism index is of limited value where ΔE (instrumental colour difference for a given illuminant) is > 0,5. The metamerism index is not suited for determining the absolute colour difference or colour consistency of a given specimen at change of illuminant.
The colour difference under the reference illuminant is to be measured in colour coordinates L*, a* and b*.
Excluded from this method are organic coatings producing fluorescence and/or which are multicoloured, pearlescent or metallic.
Establishing a reference as well as the magnitude of an acceptable colour difference are not covered by this method.
Two methods are given in this document:
a) instrumental colour difference measurement using a tristimulus colourimeter;
b) instrumental colour difference measurement using a spectrophotometer or equivalent.
It is advised that care is taken when measuring e.g.
— textured surfaces;
— fluorescent coatings;
— metameric coatings;
— multi-coloured, pearlescent, metallic or special colour effect coatings.
Base documents:
EN 13523-3:2021
Replaced:
EVS-EN 13523-3:2024
EVS-EN 3879:2023
Aerospace series - Metallic materials - Filler metal for welding - Technical specification
Scope:
This document defines the requirements for the ordering, manufacture, testing, inspection and delivery of all forms of filler metal. It shall be applied when referred to and in conjunction with the EN material standard unless otherwise specified on the drawing, order or inspection schedule.
Base documents:
EN 3879:2023
Replaced:
EVS-EN 4877-001:2024
EVS-EN ISO 15610:2023
Specification and qualification of welding procedures for metallic materials - Qualification based on tested welding consumables (ISO 15610:2023)
Scope:
This document specifies how a welding procedure can be qualified by using tested welding consumable
data. It expands on the requirements given in ISO 15607.
In addition, it gives the range of qualification.
This document is applicable to the welding processes according to Table 1.
Application of this document is limited to parent material groups 1.1, 8.1, 21, 22.1 and 22.2 in accordance
with ISO/TR 15608, which produce acceptable microstructures and properties in the heat-affected
zone which do not deteriorate significantly in service.
This document is limited to:
— parent material thicknesses t ≤ 40 mm (groups 1.1 and 8.1) and t ≤ 20 mm (groups 21, 22.1 and
22.2);
— fillet welds with throat thickness a ≥ 1 mm.
This document is not applicable when any of the following is specified for the welded joint:
a) hardness;
b) impact properties;
c) preheating;
d) controlled heat input;
e) interpass temperature;
f) post-weld heat treatment.
The use of this document can also be restricted by an application standard, specification or other
documents.
data. It expands on the requirements given in ISO 15607.
In addition, it gives the range of qualification.
This document is applicable to the welding processes according to Table 1.
Application of this document is limited to parent material groups 1.1, 8.1, 21, 22.1 and 22.2 in accordance
with ISO/TR 15608, which produce acceptable microstructures and properties in the heat-affected
zone which do not deteriorate significantly in service.
This document is limited to:
— parent material thicknesses t ≤ 40 mm (groups 1.1 and 8.1) and t ≤ 20 mm (groups 21, 22.1 and
22.2);
— fillet welds with throat thickness a ≥ 1 mm.
This document is not applicable when any of the following is specified for the welded joint:
a) hardness;
b) impact properties;
c) preheating;
d) controlled heat input;
e) interpass temperature;
f) post-weld heat treatment.
The use of this document can also be restricted by an application standard, specification or other
documents.
Base documents:
ISO 15610:2023; EN ISO 15610:2023
Replaced:
EVS-EN ISO 15610:2024
EVS-EN 13523-21:2017
Coil coated metals - Test methods - Part 21: Evaluation of outdoor exposed panels
Scope:
This part of the EN 13523 series specifies the procedure for evaluating the behaviour of an organic coating on a metallic substrate during and after outdoor exposure. Panel design, preparation and the procedure for outdoor exposure are performed in accordance with EN 13523 19.
After washing of the panel, some dirt can remain on the panel. This remaining dirt can influence the accuracy and precision of readings of gloss and colour, performed on exposed panels, although carried out in accordance with the standards. Unlike other precise measurements, the objective of this European Standard is to report on trends in the corrosion and/or paint degradation behaviour of coil coated panels.
After washing of the panel, some dirt can remain on the panel. This remaining dirt can influence the accuracy and precision of readings of gloss and colour, performed on exposed panels, although carried out in accordance with the standards. Unlike other precise measurements, the objective of this European Standard is to report on trends in the corrosion and/or paint degradation behaviour of coil coated panels.
Base documents:
EN 13523-21:2017
Replaced:
EVS-EN 13523-21:2024
ISO 17672:2016
Brazing -- Filler metals
Scope:
ISO 17672:2016 specifies the compositional ranges of a series of filler metals used for brazing. The filler metals are divided into seven classes, related to their composition, but not necessarily to the major element present.
Base documents:
Replaced:
ISO 17672:2024
Drafts
prEN ISO 21952
Welding consumables - Wire electrodes, wires, rods and deposits for gas shielded arc welding of creep-resisting steels - Classification (ISO/DIS 21952:2024)
Scope:
ISO 21952:2012 specifies requirements for classification of wire electrodes, wires and rods for gas shielded metal arc welding and tungsten inert-gas welding of creep-resisting steels, and for their deposits in the as-welded or post-weld heat-treated condition. One wire electrode can be tested and classified with different shielding gases.
ISO 21952:2012 is a combined specification providing for classification utilizing a system based upon the chemical composition of wire electrodes, wires and rods with requirements for yield strength and average impact energy of 47 J of all-weld metal, or utilizing a system based upon the tensile strength of the all-weld metal deposits and the chemical composition of wire electrodes, wires and rods.
ISO 21952:2012 is a combined specification providing for classification utilizing a system based upon the chemical composition of wire electrodes, wires and rods with requirements for yield strength and average impact energy of 47 J of all-weld metal, or utilizing a system based upon the tensile strength of the all-weld metal deposits and the chemical composition of wire electrodes, wires and rods.
Base documents:
ISO/DIS 21952; prEN ISO 21952
prEN ISO 14343
Welding consumables - Wire electrodes, strip electrodes, wires and rods for arc welding of stainless and heat resisting steels - Classification (ISO/DIS 14343:2024)
Scope:
ISO 14343:2017 specifies requirements for classification of wire electrodes, strip electrodes, wires and rods for gas-shielded metal arc welding, gas tungsten arc welding, plasma arc welding, submerged arc welding, electroslag welding and laser beam welding of stainless and heat-resisting steels. The classification of the wire electrodes, strip electrodes, wires and rods is based upon their chemical composition.
This document is a combined specification providing for classification utilizing a system based upon nominal composition (system A), or utilizing a system based upon alloy type (system B).
a) Paragraphs which carry the label "classification according to nominal composition" and the suffix letter "A", or "ISO 14343-A", are applicable only to products classified according to system A;
b) Paragraphs which carry the label "classification according to alloy type" and the suffix letter "B", or "ISO 14343-B", are applicable only to products classified according to system B.
c) Paragraphs which carry neither label nor suffix letter are applicable to products that can be classified according to either system A or B or both.
This document is a combined specification providing for classification utilizing a system based upon nominal composition (system A), or utilizing a system based upon alloy type (system B).
a) Paragraphs which carry the label "classification according to nominal composition" and the suffix letter "A", or "ISO 14343-A", are applicable only to products classified according to system A;
b) Paragraphs which carry the label "classification according to alloy type" and the suffix letter "B", or "ISO 14343-B", are applicable only to products classified according to system B.
c) Paragraphs which carry neither label nor suffix letter are applicable to products that can be classified according to either system A or B or both.
Base documents:
ISO/DIS 14343; prEN ISO 14343
prEN ISO 26304
Welding consumables - Solid wire electrodes, tubular cored electrodes and electrode-flux combinations for submerged arc welding of high strength steels - Classification (ISO/DIS 26304:2024)
Scope:
ISO 26304:2017 specifies requirements for classification of solid wire electrodes, tubular cored electrodes, and electrode-flux combinations (the all-weld metal deposits) in the as-welded condition and in the post-weld heat-treated condition for submerged arc welding of high strength steels with a minimum yield strength greater than 500 MPa or a minimum tensile strength greater than 570 MPa. One flux can be tested and classified with different electrodes. One electrode can be tested and classified with different fluxes. The solid wire electrode is also classified separately based on its chemical composition.
This document is a combined specification providing for classification utilizing a system based on the yield strength and average impact energy of 47 J for the all-weld metal, or utilizing a system based on the tensile strength and average impact energy of 27 J for the all-weld metal.
a) Clauses, subclauses and tables which carry the suffix letter "A" are applicable only to solid wire electrodes, tubular cored electrodes and the all-weld metal deposits classified to the system based on the yield strength and the average impact energy of 47 J for the all-weld metal obtained with electrode-flux combinations in accordance with this document.
b) Clauses, subclauses and tables which carry the suffix letter "B" are applicable only to solid wire electrodes, tubular cored electrodes and the all-weld metal deposits classified to the system based on the tensile strength and the average impact energy of 27 J for the all-weld metal obtained with electrode-flux combinations in accordance with this document.
c) Clauses, subclauses and tables which do not have either the suffix letter "A" or the suffix letter "B" are applicable to all solid wire electrodes, tubular cored electrodes and electrode-flux combinations classified in accordance with this document.
For comparison purposes, some tables include requirements for electrodes classified in accordance with both systems, placing individual electrodes from the two systems, which are similar in composition and properties, on adjacent lines in the particular table. In a particular line of the table that is mandatory in one system, the symbol for the similar electrode from the other system is indicated in parentheses. By appropriate restriction of the formulation of a particular electrode, it is often, but not always, possible to produce an electrode that can be classified in both systems, in which case the electrode, or its packaging, can be marked with the classification in either or both systems.
This document is a combined specification providing for classification utilizing a system based on the yield strength and average impact energy of 47 J for the all-weld metal, or utilizing a system based on the tensile strength and average impact energy of 27 J for the all-weld metal.
a) Clauses, subclauses and tables which carry the suffix letter "A" are applicable only to solid wire electrodes, tubular cored electrodes and the all-weld metal deposits classified to the system based on the yield strength and the average impact energy of 47 J for the all-weld metal obtained with electrode-flux combinations in accordance with this document.
b) Clauses, subclauses and tables which carry the suffix letter "B" are applicable only to solid wire electrodes, tubular cored electrodes and the all-weld metal deposits classified to the system based on the tensile strength and the average impact energy of 27 J for the all-weld metal obtained with electrode-flux combinations in accordance with this document.
c) Clauses, subclauses and tables which do not have either the suffix letter "A" or the suffix letter "B" are applicable to all solid wire electrodes, tubular cored electrodes and electrode-flux combinations classified in accordance with this document.
For comparison purposes, some tables include requirements for electrodes classified in accordance with both systems, placing individual electrodes from the two systems, which are similar in composition and properties, on adjacent lines in the particular table. In a particular line of the table that is mandatory in one system, the symbol for the similar electrode from the other system is indicated in parentheses. By appropriate restriction of the formulation of a particular electrode, it is often, but not always, possible to produce an electrode that can be classified in both systems, in which case the electrode, or its packaging, can be marked with the classification in either or both systems.
Base documents:
ISO/DIS 26304; prEN ISO 26304
prEN IEC 62841-2-22:2024
Electric motor-operated hand-held tools, transportable tools and lawn and garden machinery - Safety - Part 2-22: Particular requirements for hand-held cut-off machines
Scope:
IEC 62841-1:2014, Clause 1 is applicable, except as follows:
Replacement of the third paragraph:
The rated voltage is not more than 250 V for single-phase a.c. or d.c. tools, and 480 V for three-phase a.c. tools.
Addition:
This document applies to hand-held cut-off machines fitted with
– one bonded reinforced wheel of Type 41 or Type 42; or
– one or more diamond cutting wheels with peripheral gaps, if any,
• having no positive rake angle for flush cutters, power cutters and wall chasers; and
• not exceeding 10 mm and having no positive rake angle for cut-off machines other than flush cutters, power cutters and wall chasers;
and with
– a rated speed not exceeding a peripheral speed of the wheel of 100 m/s at rated capacity;
and
– a rated capacity not exceeding 430 mm.
NOTE 101 An example of a permitted diamond cutting wheel construction is shown in Figure 101.
These tools are intended to cut materials such as metals, concrete, masonry, glass and tile.
This document does not apply to:
– cut-off machines that can be converted to a grinder, sander or polisher, which are covered by IEC 62841-2-3;
– circular saws which are covered by IEC 62841-2-5; and
– die grinders and small rotary tools which are covered by IEC 62841-2-23;
– tools intended to cut wood, except for utility cutters;
– cut-off machines fitted with a bonded reinforced wheel of Type 42 with a diameter exceeding 230 mm.
Replacement of the third paragraph:
The rated voltage is not more than 250 V for single-phase a.c. or d.c. tools, and 480 V for three-phase a.c. tools.
Addition:
This document applies to hand-held cut-off machines fitted with
– one bonded reinforced wheel of Type 41 or Type 42; or
– one or more diamond cutting wheels with peripheral gaps, if any,
• having no positive rake angle for flush cutters, power cutters and wall chasers; and
• not exceeding 10 mm and having no positive rake angle for cut-off machines other than flush cutters, power cutters and wall chasers;
and with
– a rated speed not exceeding a peripheral speed of the wheel of 100 m/s at rated capacity;
and
– a rated capacity not exceeding 430 mm.
NOTE 101 An example of a permitted diamond cutting wheel construction is shown in Figure 101.
These tools are intended to cut materials such as metals, concrete, masonry, glass and tile.
This document does not apply to:
– cut-off machines that can be converted to a grinder, sander or polisher, which are covered by IEC 62841-2-3;
– circular saws which are covered by IEC 62841-2-5; and
– die grinders and small rotary tools which are covered by IEC 62841-2-23;
– tools intended to cut wood, except for utility cutters;
– cut-off machines fitted with a bonded reinforced wheel of Type 42 with a diameter exceeding 230 mm.
Base documents:
116/749/CDV; prEN IEC 62841-2-22:2024
prEN IEC 62841-2-22:2024/prAA:2024
Electric motor-operated hand-held tools, transportable tools and lawn and garden machinery - Safety - Part 2-22: Particular requirements for hand-held cut-off machines
Scope:
Amendment to prEN IEC 62841-2-22
Base documents:
prEN IEC 62841-2-22:2024/prAA:2024