Infoteenus
67 TOIDUAINETE TEHNOLOOGIA
Uued standardid
EVS-EN ISO 10399:2026
Sensory analysis - Methodology - Duo-trio test (ISO 10399:2026)
Käsitlusala: This document specifies a procedure for determining whether a perceptible sensory difference or similarity exists between samples of two products. The method is a forced-choice procedure. The method is applicable whether a difference exists in a single sensory attribute or in several attributes.
The method is statistically less efficient than the triangle test (described in ISO 4120) but is easier to perform by the assessors.
The method is applicable even when the nature of the difference is unknown (i.e. it determines neither the size nor the direction of difference between samples, nor is there any indication of the attribute(s) responsible for the difference). The method is applicable only if the products are fairly homogeneous.
The method is effective for:
a) determining that either:
1. a perceptible difference results (duo-trio testing for difference); or
2. a meaningful perceptible difference does not result (duo-trio testing for similarity) when, for example, a change is made in ingredients, processing, packaging, handling or storage;
b) selecting, training and monitoring assessors.
Two forms of the method are described:
- the constant-reference technique, used when one product is familiar to the assessors (e.g. a sample from regular production);
- the balanced-reference technique, used when one product is not more familiar than the other.
The method is statistically less efficient than the triangle test (described in ISO 4120) but is easier to perform by the assessors.
The method is applicable even when the nature of the difference is unknown (i.e. it determines neither the size nor the direction of difference between samples, nor is there any indication of the attribute(s) responsible for the difference). The method is applicable only if the products are fairly homogeneous.
The method is effective for:
a) determining that either:
1. a perceptible difference results (duo-trio testing for difference); or
2. a meaningful perceptible difference does not result (duo-trio testing for similarity) when, for example, a change is made in ingredients, processing, packaging, handling or storage;
b) selecting, training and monitoring assessors.
Two forms of the method are described:
- the constant-reference technique, used when one product is familiar to the assessors (e.g. a sample from regular production);
- the balanced-reference technique, used when one product is not more familiar than the other.
Alusdokumendid: ISO 10399:2026; EN ISO 10399:2026
Asendab: EVS-EN ISO 10399:2018
EVS-EN ISO 21415-2:2026
Wheat and wheat flour - Gluten content - Part 2: Determination of wet gluten and gluten index by mechanical means (ISO 21415-2:2026)
Käsitlusala: This document specifies a method for determining the content of wet gluten and the gluten index for wheat flours (Triticum aestivum L. and Triticum durum Desf.) by mechanical means.
This document is directly applicable to flours. It is also applicable to common and durum wheat after grinding, if their particular size distribution meets the specification given in Table B.1.
NOTE This document is related to ICC 137/1[7], ICC 155[8] and AACC Method 38-12.02[9].
This document is directly applicable to flours. It is also applicable to common and durum wheat after grinding, if their particular size distribution meets the specification given in Table B.1.
NOTE This document is related to ICC 137/1[7], ICC 155[8] and AACC Method 38-12.02[9].
Alusdokumendid: ISO 21415-2:2026; EN ISO 21415-2:2026
Asendab: EVS-EN ISO 21415-2:2015
CEN ISO/TS 21569-10:2026
Horizontal methods for molecular biomarker analysis - Methods of analysis for the detection of genetically modified organisms and derived products - Part 10: Construct- and event-specific detection methods for genetically modified salmon expressing CS-GHc2 growth hormone (ISO/TS 21569 10:2026)
Käsitlusala: This document specifies procedures for the detection of a DNA sequence of a construct used to (genetically) enhance the growth of fish commonly found in aquaculture. The genetically modified AquAdvantage Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) carries the construct expressing CS-GHc2 growth hormone and can be detected based on a real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) targeting either the border between the growth hormone coding sequence (CS-GHc2) of Oncorhynchus tshawytscha (Chinook salmon) and the antifreeze terminator (T-AFP) of (Macro-) Zoarces americanus (ocean pout), i.e. with the construct-specific method, or the border between the Atlantic salmon genomic DNA and the antifreeze promoter (P-AFP) of ocean pout, i.e. with the event-specific method. These methods can be applied to identify the genetically modified (GM) fish or for screening purposes.
This document is applicable for the analysis of DNA extracted from foodstuffs. It can also be suitable for the analysis of DNA extracted from other products such as feedstuffs. The application of these methods requires the extraction of an adequate amount of amplifiable DNA from the relevant matrix.
This document is applicable for the analysis of DNA extracted from foodstuffs. It can also be suitable for the analysis of DNA extracted from other products such as feedstuffs. The application of these methods requires the extraction of an adequate amount of amplifiable DNA from the relevant matrix.
Alusdokumendid: ISO/TS 21569-10:2026; CEN ISO/TS 21569-10:2026
CWA 18387:2026
Seafood marketing - Recommendations - Consumer and seafood types
Käsitlusala: This document provides recommendations on how to efficiently communicate with consumers about seafood, and to engage and influence various types of consumers to encourage consumption of sustainable seafood. Seafood as part of a meal also containing non-seafood ingredients, e.g. ready-to-eat meals, is included in this document.
This document excludes:
- food or feed for species other than humans;
- food items with only a small fraction of seafood;
- dietary supplements.
This document does not differentiate between information elements that are mandatory to share (e.g. because of labelling regulations) and information elements that are voluntary. That is partly because the legally required information elements represent a minimum and need to be communicated regardless of any recommendations, and partly because various labelling regulations exist in different domains. The objective of this CWA is to make these recommendations generally relevant and applicable.
This document does not go into detail on how claims made in a marketing campaign might be verified, nor does it recommend communicating information elements that are likely to be perceived as negative by the consumer. The reason is that while verification and the ability to substantiate a claim is important, it is not normally part of a marketing campaign (and neither is the highlighting of information that is unlikely to elicit a positive reaction). An exception to this is certification status that can constitute indirect verification of some claims, and which it may be relevant to communicate in some circumstances.
This document excludes:
- food or feed for species other than humans;
- food items with only a small fraction of seafood;
- dietary supplements.
This document does not differentiate between information elements that are mandatory to share (e.g. because of labelling regulations) and information elements that are voluntary. That is partly because the legally required information elements represent a minimum and need to be communicated regardless of any recommendations, and partly because various labelling regulations exist in different domains. The objective of this CWA is to make these recommendations generally relevant and applicable.
This document does not go into detail on how claims made in a marketing campaign might be verified, nor does it recommend communicating information elements that are likely to be perceived as negative by the consumer. The reason is that while verification and the ability to substantiate a claim is important, it is not normally part of a marketing campaign (and neither is the highlighting of information that is unlikely to elicit a positive reaction). An exception to this is certification status that can constitute indirect verification of some claims, and which it may be relevant to communicate in some circumstances.
Alusdokumendid: CWA 18387:2026
ISO 21415-2:2026
Wheat and wheat flour — Gluten content — Part 2: Determination of wet gluten and gluten index by mechanical means
Käsitlusala: This document specifies a method for determining the content of wet gluten and the gluten index for wheat flours (Triticum aestivum L. and Triticum durum Desf.) by mechanical means.
This document is directly applicable to flours. It is also applicable to common and durum wheat after grinding, if their particular size distribution meets the specification given in Table B.1.
NOTE This document is related to ICC 137/1[7], ICC 155[8] and AACC Method 38-12.02[9].
This document is directly applicable to flours. It is also applicable to common and durum wheat after grinding, if their particular size distribution meets the specification given in Table B.1.
NOTE This document is related to ICC 137/1[7], ICC 155[8] and AACC Method 38-12.02[9].
Alusdokumendid:
Asendab: ISO 21415-2:2015
ISO 20810:2026
Whole grain — Definition and technical criteria
Käsitlusala: This document specifies the definition and technical criteria for whole grain as a food ingredient (or “raw material”) and further specifies the requirements for designating whole-grain foods derived from cereals and certain pseudocereals on packaging, labelling and claims.
The document is applicable to business-to-business and business-to-consumer communication, to the food trade and to food labelling and claims.
The definition and technical criteria are only applicable to post-harvest/collecting of the grain.
The document specifies technical criteria to all food and beverage companies, applicable to all organizations, regardless of size or complexity. This document is intended for use in business-to-business and business-to-consumer communications, relationships in the global supply chain, the international trade of food products, and food labelling and claims.
NOTE The definition, technical criteria and criteria for food labelling and claims are generic. This document does not specify detailed criteria or technical guidance for specific types of grains and products.
The document is applicable to business-to-business and business-to-consumer communication, to the food trade and to food labelling and claims.
The definition and technical criteria are only applicable to post-harvest/collecting of the grain.
The document specifies technical criteria to all food and beverage companies, applicable to all organizations, regardless of size or complexity. This document is intended for use in business-to-business and business-to-consumer communications, relationships in the global supply chain, the international trade of food products, and food labelling and claims.
NOTE The definition, technical criteria and criteria for food labelling and claims are generic. This document does not specify detailed criteria or technical guidance for specific types of grains and products.
Alusdokumendid:
Asendatud standardid
EVS-EN ISO 21569:2005
Foodstuffs - Methods of analysis for the detection of genetically modified organisms and derived products - Qualitative nucleic acid based methods
Käsitlusala: This International Standard describes the procedure to qualitatively detect genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and derived products by analysing the nucleic acids extracted from the sample under study. The main focus is on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based amplification methods.
Alusdokumendid: ISO 21569:2005; EN ISO 21569:2005
EVS-EN ISO 21569:2005/A1:2013
Foodstuffs - Methods of analysis for the detection of genetically modified organisms and derived products - Qualitative nucleic acid based methods - Amendment 1 (ISO 21569:2005/Amd 1:2013)
Käsitlusala: This International Standard describes the procedure to qualitatively detect genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and derived products by analysing the nucleic acids extracted from the sample under study. The main focus is on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based amplification methods.
Alusdokumendid: ISO 21569:2005/Amd 1:2013; EN ISO 21569:2005/A1:2013
EVS-EN ISO 21415-2:2015
Wheat and wheat flour - Gluten content - Part 2: Determination of wet gluten and gluten index by mechanical means (ISO 21415-2:2015)
Käsitlusala: This part of ISO 21415 specifies a method for determining the content of wet gluten and the gluten index for wheat flours (Triticum aestivum L. and Triticum durum Desf.) by mechanical means. This method is directly applicable to flours. It also applies to common and durum wheat after grinding, if their particular size distribution meets the specification given in Table B.1.
Alusdokumendid: ISO 21415-2:2015; EN ISO 21415-2:2015
Asendatud: EVS-EN ISO 21415-2:2026
ISO 21415-2:2015
Wheat and wheat flour -- Gluten content -- Part 2: Determination of wet gluten and gluten index by mechanical means
Käsitlusala: ISO 21415-2:2015 specifies a method for determining the content of wet gluten and the gluten index for wheat flours (Triticum aestivum L. and Triticum durum Desf.) by mechanical means. This method is directly applicable to flours. It also applies to common and durum wheat after grinding, if their particular size distribution meets the specification given in Table B.1.
Alusdokumendid:
Asendatud: ISO 21415-2:2026
CEN/TR 852:2010
Plastics piping systems for the transport of water intended for human consumption - Migration assessment - Guidance on the interpretation of laboratory derived migration values
Käsitlusala: This Technical Report is applicable to plastics pipes, joints and fittings to be used for the transport of water intended for human consumption and raw water used for the manufacture of water intended for human consumption. It gives guidance on: a) the number of successive migration periods to be carried out; b) how to interpret M values calculated from successive migration periods; c) a method for converting M values into values that reflect field use conditions; d) acceptance criteria for the duplicate M values obtained by testing in accordance with EN ISO 8795.
Alusdokumendid: CEN/TR 852:2010
EVS-EN 601:2004
Aluminium and aluminium alloys - Castings - Chemical composition of castings for use in contact with food
Käsitlusala: This European Standard specifies the maximum percentage content of alloying elements and impurities in
aluminium and aluminium alloy cast materials and articles designed to be in contact with food and contains
provisions for the demonstration of conformity of products with the present standard.
aluminium and aluminium alloy cast materials and articles designed to be in contact with food and contains
provisions for the demonstration of conformity of products with the present standard.
Alusdokumendid: EN 601:2004
Asendatud: EVS-EN 601:2026
EVS-EN ISO 10399:2018
Sensory analysis - Methodology - Duo-trio test (ISO 10399:2017)
Käsitlusala: ISO 10399:2017 specifies a procedure for determining whether a perceptible sensory difference or similarity exists between samples of two products. The method is a forced-choice procedure. The method is applicable whether a difference exists in a single sensory attribute or in several attributes.
The method is statistically less efficient than the triangle test (described in ISO 4120) but is easier to perform by the assessors.
The method is applicable even when the nature of the difference is unknown (i.e. it determines neither the size nor the direction of difference between samples, nor is there any indication of the attribute(s) responsible for the difference). The method is applicable only if the products are fairly homogeneous.
The method is effective for
a) determining that
either a perceptible difference results (duo-trio testing for difference), or
a perceptible difference does not result (duo-trio testing for similarity) when, for example, a change is made in ingredients, processing, packaging, handling or storage, and
b) for selecting, training and monitoring assessors.
Two forms of the method are described:
- the constant-reference technique, used when one product is familiar to the assessors (e.g. a sample from regular production);
- the balanced-reference technique, used when one product is not more familiar than the other.
The method is statistically less efficient than the triangle test (described in ISO 4120) but is easier to perform by the assessors.
The method is applicable even when the nature of the difference is unknown (i.e. it determines neither the size nor the direction of difference between samples, nor is there any indication of the attribute(s) responsible for the difference). The method is applicable only if the products are fairly homogeneous.
The method is effective for
a) determining that
either a perceptible difference results (duo-trio testing for difference), or
a perceptible difference does not result (duo-trio testing for similarity) when, for example, a change is made in ingredients, processing, packaging, handling or storage, and
b) for selecting, training and monitoring assessors.
Two forms of the method are described:
- the constant-reference technique, used when one product is familiar to the assessors (e.g. a sample from regular production);
- the balanced-reference technique, used when one product is not more familiar than the other.
Alusdokumendid: ISO 10399:2017; EN ISO 10399:2018
Asendatud: EVS-EN ISO 10399:2026
Kavandid
prEN ISO 10519
Rapeseed - Determination of chlorophyll content - Spectrometric method (ISO/DIS 10519:2026)
Käsitlusala: ISO 10519:2015 specifies a spectrometric method for the determination of the chlorophyll content of rapeseed. It is not applicable to the determination of chlorophyll in oils.
Alusdokumendid: ISO/FDIS 10519; prEN ISO 10519