Information service
03 Services. Company organization, management and quality. Administration. Transport. Sociology
New standards
EVS-ISO 5725-2:2026
Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results — Part 2: Basic method for the determination of repeatability and reproducibility of a standard measurement method (ISO 5725-2:2025, identical)
Scope: 1.1 This document
— amplifies the general principles for designing experiments for the numerical estimation of the precision of measurement methods by means of a collaborative interlaboratory experiment,
— provides a detailed practical description of the basic method for routine use in estimating the precision of measurement methods, and
— provides guidance to all personnel concerned with designing, performing or analysing the results of the tests for estimating precision.
NOTE Modifications to this basic method for particular purposes are given in other parts of ISO 5725.
1.2 It is concerned exclusively with measurement methods which yield measurements on a continuous scale and give a single value as the test result, although this single value can be the outcome of a calculation from a set of observations.
1.3 It assumes that in the design and performance of the precision experiment, all the principles as laid down in ISO 5725-1 are observed. The basic method uses the same number of test results in each laboratory, with each laboratory analysing the same levels of test sample; i.e. a balanced uniform-level experiment. The basic method applies to procedures that have been standardized and are in regular use in a number of laboratories.
1.4 The statistical model of ISO 5725-1:2023, Clause 5, is accepted as a suitable basis for the interpretation and analysis of the test results, the distribution of which is approximately normal.
1.5 The basic method, as described in this document, (usually) estimates the precision of a measurement method:
a) when it is required to determine the repeatability and reproducibility standard deviations as defined in ISO 5725-1;
b) when the materials to be used are homogeneous, or when the effects of heterogeneity can be included in the precision values;
c) when the use of a balanced uniform-level layout is acceptable.
1.6 The same approach can be used to make a preliminary estimate of precision for measurement methods which have not reached standardization or are not in routine use.
— amplifies the general principles for designing experiments for the numerical estimation of the precision of measurement methods by means of a collaborative interlaboratory experiment,
— provides a detailed practical description of the basic method for routine use in estimating the precision of measurement methods, and
— provides guidance to all personnel concerned with designing, performing or analysing the results of the tests for estimating precision.
NOTE Modifications to this basic method for particular purposes are given in other parts of ISO 5725.
1.2 It is concerned exclusively with measurement methods which yield measurements on a continuous scale and give a single value as the test result, although this single value can be the outcome of a calculation from a set of observations.
1.3 It assumes that in the design and performance of the precision experiment, all the principles as laid down in ISO 5725-1 are observed. The basic method uses the same number of test results in each laboratory, with each laboratory analysing the same levels of test sample; i.e. a balanced uniform-level experiment. The basic method applies to procedures that have been standardized and are in regular use in a number of laboratories.
1.4 The statistical model of ISO 5725-1:2023, Clause 5, is accepted as a suitable basis for the interpretation and analysis of the test results, the distribution of which is approximately normal.
1.5 The basic method, as described in this document, (usually) estimates the precision of a measurement method:
a) when it is required to determine the repeatability and reproducibility standard deviations as defined in ISO 5725-1;
b) when the materials to be used are homogeneous, or when the effects of heterogeneity can be included in the precision values;
c) when the use of a balanced uniform-level layout is acceptable.
1.6 The same approach can be used to make a preliminary estimate of precision for measurement methods which have not reached standardization or are not in routine use.
Base documents: ISO 5725-2:2025
Replaces: EVS-ISO 5725-2:2024
ISO 23665:2026
Uncrewed aircraft systems — Training for personnel involved in UAS operations
Scope: This document specifies the procedures for training personnel who will be involved in the operation of uncrewed aircraft systems (UAS).
This document defines:
knowledge, skill, attitude and qualification criteria required for UAS remote pilots (RP), remote pilot in command (rPIC) and UAS training organizations (UTO) that provide training to UAS remote pilots and other personnel involved in UAS operations;
training curriculum and contents for specific learning courses;
qualification and criteria for verification of achieved competence by the training organizations;
general procedures for providing training of UAS personnel.
NOTE 1 An UTO can include additional topics or learning objectives, such as when required by legally binding rules in the applicable jurisdiction.
NOTE 2 A UAS operator can also act as the UTO, providing that possible conflict of interest between training and operations is properly managed.
This document defines:
knowledge, skill, attitude and qualification criteria required for UAS remote pilots (RP), remote pilot in command (rPIC) and UAS training organizations (UTO) that provide training to UAS remote pilots and other personnel involved in UAS operations;
training curriculum and contents for specific learning courses;
qualification and criteria for verification of achieved competence by the training organizations;
general procedures for providing training of UAS personnel.
NOTE 1 An UTO can include additional topics or learning objectives, such as when required by legally binding rules in the applicable jurisdiction.
NOTE 2 A UAS operator can also act as the UTO, providing that possible conflict of interest between training and operations is properly managed.
Base documents:
Replaces: ISO 23665:2023
ISO 11462-1:2026
Implementation of statistical process control (SPC) — Part 1: Statistical process management — Elements, tools and techniques of SPC
Scope: This document gives guidance on the implementation of a statistical process control (SPC) system and an overview of tools and techniques to assist an organisation in planning, implementing and evaluating an effective statistical process control (SPC) system.
This document specifies SPC system guidelines for use
when a supplier's capability to reduce variation in processes associated with design or production needs to be proven or improved, or
when a supplier is beginning SPC implementation to achieve such capability.
This document considers the complete industrial supply chain. It describes some essential statistical methods that can be used to continuously improve capability or performance and stability of production processes.
The bottom line is that production processes are controlled economically, promptly and effectively. As a result, a predefined level of quality can be realised. The improvement of stability and performance or capability of the production processes effectively reduces waste and machine downtime or increases productivity. If defective production parts are found in a random sample, they can be sorted out and, if necessary, further measures can be initiated.
This document specifies SPC system guidelines for use
when a supplier's capability to reduce variation in processes associated with design or production needs to be proven or improved, or
when a supplier is beginning SPC implementation to achieve such capability.
This document considers the complete industrial supply chain. It describes some essential statistical methods that can be used to continuously improve capability or performance and stability of production processes.
The bottom line is that production processes are controlled economically, promptly and effectively. As a result, a predefined level of quality can be realised. The improvement of stability and performance or capability of the production processes effectively reduces waste and machine downtime or increases productivity. If defective production parts are found in a random sample, they can be sorted out and, if necessary, further measures can be initiated.
Base documents:
ISO 16785:2026
Electronic fee collection — Application interface definition between dedicated short-range communication on-board equipment (DSRC-OBE) and external in-vehicle devices
Scope: This document specifies requirements for an application interface between dedicated short-range communication on-board equipment (DSRC-OBE) and external in-vehicle devices to make DSRC-OBE applicable for diversified electronic fee collection (EFC) systems.
This document applies to:
— definitions of the application interface between DSRC-OBE and external in-vehicle devices;
— definitions of data groups and data elements.
This document applies to:
— definitions of the application interface between DSRC-OBE and external in-vehicle devices;
— definitions of data groups and data elements.
Base documents:
Replaces: ISO/TS 16785:2020
ISO 22353:2026
Security and resilience — Guidelines for crowd management
Scope: This document provides guidelines for crowd management at events, mass gatherings and crowded places. It is designed to assist event organizers, event rights holders, event hosts, venue operators and emergency services in planning and executing effective, successful and safe crowd management by ensuring:
implementation of the framework and principles for crowd management;
necessary event and crowd profiling to understand the crowd management risk;
available spaces for expected crowds using crowd capacity assessments;
sufficient crowd management in the ingress, event circulation, and egress phases;
safe and secure venues, spaces, and pathways for crowds in all phases and situations;
sufficient crowd management plans both for planned execution and in emergencies;
necessary engagement and involvement of public and private interested parties;
continual improvement through systematic evaluation of crowd management arrangements.
This document does not address crowd control or situations that require intervention to manage crowds that display undesirable or dangerous behaviours.
implementation of the framework and principles for crowd management;
necessary event and crowd profiling to understand the crowd management risk;
available spaces for expected crowds using crowd capacity assessments;
sufficient crowd management in the ingress, event circulation, and egress phases;
safe and secure venues, spaces, and pathways for crowds in all phases and situations;
sufficient crowd management plans both for planned execution and in emergencies;
necessary engagement and involvement of public and private interested parties;
continual improvement through systematic evaluation of crowd management arrangements.
This document does not address crowd control or situations that require intervention to manage crowds that display undesirable or dangerous behaviours.
Base documents:
ISO 24481-1:2026
Statistical methods for implementation of Six Sigma — Exploratory data analysis — Part 1: General methodology
Scope: This document describes the concept and general principles of EDA for categorical and numerical data. It also provides some guidelines for conducting EDA and its place within Six Sigma projects. This document focuses on the graphical tools of EDA.
It is applicable to organizations using manufacturing processes as well as service and transactional processes.
It is applicable to organizations using manufacturing processes as well as service and transactional processes.
Base documents:
CEN/TR 18359:2026
Public transport – Common Glossary
Scope: The scope of this TR is a Public Transport common glossary to harmonise terms and definitions from existing data dictionaries.
The methodology consisting of highlighting the differences between various use contexts arises from a number of factors, many of them practical:
1) The facts of history. Many of the legislations, as noted (especially EU Regulations, EC Delegated Regulations and EC Implementing Decisions), already have mandatory application of varying scope, and the regulatory bodies would be most unlikely to consider it worthwhile to actually modify them in line with some list of precise terms developed after the fact.
2) The diversity of practices and use-cases which have been included in the Public Transport domain. Especially as a result of the need for this domain to cover multi-modality and developing technologies, and the increasing requirement for Public Transport to interact with wider domains such as Road Traffic Management, there are bound to be some deeply embedded terms which have been used in different senses in different domains.
3) The differing nature and working practices involved in the legislative, regulatory and technical standardisation processes, and their relationship both to one another and to real-world implementors of Public Transport services.
4) The prior existence of a well-established and precise set of Conceptual Models, including terms and definitions, in the Transmodel ecosystem. This is self-consistent and clearly defined and is being maintained on a continuous basis. However, its use in a legislative context is by “delegation”, which may do little to decrease the possibility of regulations themselves making use of some terms in a sense not intended by Transmodel itself.
The format of the glossary will be structured around following sections:
- Contexts: Summary of the contexts in which the term or phrase is defined.
- Related terms: Phrases in which the term is used, either as an element in a compound (e.g. the term “access” vs “access right” or where a related term is used which carries a notably different association (e.g. the term “access” vs “accessibility”, where the latter has a precise meaning in some contexts).
- Concept: Where it is possible to identify a unifying concept among the various definitions. An informal or explanatory summary of that concept. Where it is not possible, a note of that fact.
- Harmonisation: Containing references and links to the definitions in their contexts and the suggested conventions for citing them in contexts other than those where they are defined.
- Source references: Links to definitions of the exact term in their contexts.
- Usage recommendations: Recommendations for how the terms should be cited in contexts outside that in which the term is defined.
The methodology consisting of highlighting the differences between various use contexts arises from a number of factors, many of them practical:
1) The facts of history. Many of the legislations, as noted (especially EU Regulations, EC Delegated Regulations and EC Implementing Decisions), already have mandatory application of varying scope, and the regulatory bodies would be most unlikely to consider it worthwhile to actually modify them in line with some list of precise terms developed after the fact.
2) The diversity of practices and use-cases which have been included in the Public Transport domain. Especially as a result of the need for this domain to cover multi-modality and developing technologies, and the increasing requirement for Public Transport to interact with wider domains such as Road Traffic Management, there are bound to be some deeply embedded terms which have been used in different senses in different domains.
3) The differing nature and working practices involved in the legislative, regulatory and technical standardisation processes, and their relationship both to one another and to real-world implementors of Public Transport services.
4) The prior existence of a well-established and precise set of Conceptual Models, including terms and definitions, in the Transmodel ecosystem. This is self-consistent and clearly defined and is being maintained on a continuous basis. However, its use in a legislative context is by “delegation”, which may do little to decrease the possibility of regulations themselves making use of some terms in a sense not intended by Transmodel itself.
The format of the glossary will be structured around following sections:
- Contexts: Summary of the contexts in which the term or phrase is defined.
- Related terms: Phrases in which the term is used, either as an element in a compound (e.g. the term “access” vs “access right” or where a related term is used which carries a notably different association (e.g. the term “access” vs “accessibility”, where the latter has a precise meaning in some contexts).
- Concept: Where it is possible to identify a unifying concept among the various definitions. An informal or explanatory summary of that concept. Where it is not possible, a note of that fact.
- Harmonisation: Containing references and links to the definitions in their contexts and the suggested conventions for citing them in contexts other than those where they are defined.
- Source references: Links to definitions of the exact term in their contexts.
- Usage recommendations: Recommendations for how the terms should be cited in contexts outside that in which the term is defined.
Base documents: CEN/TR 18359:2026
IEC 63402-2-2:2026
Energy efficiency - Customer energy management system - Part 2-2: Data model and messaging - Interface between the customer energy manager and resource managers
Scope: IEC 63402-2-2:2026 specifies the fundamental aspects of semantic interoperability for the S2 interface and the related data exchange between a CEM and the resource managers within the premises. It provides a technology independent set of data models and interaction patterns in order to enable applications for energy management within the premises. This document does not include:
– mappings to concrete data representations (XML, JSON and similar);
– mappings to application protocols for the message passing;
– security related aspects.
This group EE publication is primarily intended to be used as an EE standard for the products mentioned in the scope, but is also intended to be used by TCs in the preparation of publications for products which are included in the boundary mentioned in the scope of this document
– mappings to concrete data representations (XML, JSON and similar);
– mappings to application protocols for the message passing;
– security related aspects.
This group EE publication is primarily intended to be used as an EE standard for the products mentioned in the scope, but is also intended to be used by TCs in the preparation of publications for products which are included in the boundary mentioned in the scope of this document
Base documents:
Replaced standards
ISO 11462-1:2001
Guidelines for implementation of statistical process control (SPC) -- Part 1: Elements of SPC
Scope:
Base documents:
Replaced: ISO 11462-1:2026
ISO 11462-2:2010
Guidelines for implementation of statistical process control (SPC) -- Part 2: Catalogue of tools and techniques
Scope: ISO 11462-2:2010 provides a catalogue of tools and techniques to help an organization in planning, implementation and evaluation of an effective statistical process control (SPC) system. This catalogue gives tools and techniques that are essential for the successful realization of the SPC elements.
Base documents:
Replaced: ISO 11462-1:2026
ISO/TS 16785:2020
Electronic Fee Collection (EFC) -- Application interface definition between DSRC-OBE and external in-vehicle devices
Scope: This document defines an application interface between DSRC-based OBE (hereinafter referred to as "DSRC-OBE") and an external in-vehicle device (hereinafter referred to as "the external device") to make DSRC-OBE applicable for diversified external devices.
NOTE For use in autonomous tolling and DSRC-based (CEN, UNI, ARIB, TTA and GB/T) electronic fee collection (EFC) systems. For use in urban and inter-urban toll schemes.
The scope of this document covers the following items (as shown in Figure 4):
- definitions of the application interface between DSRC-OBE and external devices, including global navigation satellite system (GNSS), cellular network (CN) and controller area network (CAN) device;
- definitions of data groups and data elements.
The following items are out of the scope of this document:
- definitions of hardware components in the external device such as GNSS module, CN module and mobile devices;
- definitions of the physical interface between DSRC-OBE and the external device such as USB and Bluetooth;
- definition of ITS services other than EFC;
- definition of algorithms for authentication, encryption and key management.
NOTE For use in autonomous tolling and DSRC-based (CEN, UNI, ARIB, TTA and GB/T) electronic fee collection (EFC) systems. For use in urban and inter-urban toll schemes.
The scope of this document covers the following items (as shown in Figure 4):
- definitions of the application interface between DSRC-OBE and external devices, including global navigation satellite system (GNSS), cellular network (CN) and controller area network (CAN) device;
- definitions of data groups and data elements.
The following items are out of the scope of this document:
- definitions of hardware components in the external device such as GNSS module, CN module and mobile devices;
- definitions of the physical interface between DSRC-OBE and the external device such as USB and Bluetooth;
- definition of ITS services other than EFC;
- definition of algorithms for authentication, encryption and key management.
Base documents:
Replaced: ISO 16785:2026
ISO 23665:2023
Unmanned aircraft systems — Training for personnel involved in UAS operations
Scope: This document describes the procedures for training personnel who will be involved in the operation of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS).
This document defines:
a) knowledge, skill, attitude and qualification criteria that are needed for UAS pilots and training organizations that provide training to UAS remote pilots and other personnel involved in UAS operations;
b) training curriculum and contents for specific learning courses;
c) qualification and confirmation criteria for the training organizations;
d) general procedures for providing training of UAS personnel; the requirements for a specific course as described in Annex A can be more restrictive in some cases.
This document defines:
a) knowledge, skill, attitude and qualification criteria that are needed for UAS pilots and training organizations that provide training to UAS remote pilots and other personnel involved in UAS operations;
b) training curriculum and contents for specific learning courses;
c) qualification and confirmation criteria for the training organizations;
d) general procedures for providing training of UAS personnel; the requirements for a specific course as described in Annex A can be more restrictive in some cases.
Base documents:
Replaced: ISO 23665:2026
EVS-ISO 5725-2:2024
Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results - Part 2: Basic method for the determination of repeatability and reproducibility of a standard measurement method (ISO 5725-2:2019, identical)
Scope: 1.1 This document
— amplifies the general principles for designing experiments for the numerical estimation of the precision of measurement methods by means of a collaborative interlaboratory experiment;
— provides a detailed practical description of the basic method for routine use in estimating the precision of measurement methods;
— provides guidance to all personnel concerned with designing, performing or analysing the results of the tests for estimating precision.
NOTE Modifications to this basic method for particular purposes are given in other parts of ISO 5725.
1.2 It is concerned exclusively with measurement methods which yield measurements on a continuous scale and give a single value as the test result, although this single value can be the outcome of a calculation from a set of observations.
1.3 It assumes that in the design and performance of the precision experiment, all the principles as laid down in ISO 5725-1 are observed. The basic method uses the same number of test results in each laboratory, with each laboratory analysing the same levels of test sample; i.e. a balanced uniform-level experiment. The basic method applies to procedures that have been standardized and are in regular use in a number of laboratories.
1.4 The statistical model of ISO 5725-1:1994, Clause 5, is accepted as a suitable basis for the interpretation and analysis of the test results, the distribution of which is approximately normal.
1.5 The basic method, as described in this document, (usually) estimates the precision of a measurement method:
a) when it is required to determine the repeatability and reproducibility standard deviations as defined in ISO 5725-1;
b) when the materials to be used are homogeneous, or when the effects of heterogeneity can be included in the precision values; and
c) when the use of a balanced uniform-level layout is acceptable.
1.6 The same approach can be used to make a preliminary estimate of precision for measurement methods which have not reached standardization or are not in routine use.
— amplifies the general principles for designing experiments for the numerical estimation of the precision of measurement methods by means of a collaborative interlaboratory experiment;
— provides a detailed practical description of the basic method for routine use in estimating the precision of measurement methods;
— provides guidance to all personnel concerned with designing, performing or analysing the results of the tests for estimating precision.
NOTE Modifications to this basic method for particular purposes are given in other parts of ISO 5725.
1.2 It is concerned exclusively with measurement methods which yield measurements on a continuous scale and give a single value as the test result, although this single value can be the outcome of a calculation from a set of observations.
1.3 It assumes that in the design and performance of the precision experiment, all the principles as laid down in ISO 5725-1 are observed. The basic method uses the same number of test results in each laboratory, with each laboratory analysing the same levels of test sample; i.e. a balanced uniform-level experiment. The basic method applies to procedures that have been standardized and are in regular use in a number of laboratories.
1.4 The statistical model of ISO 5725-1:1994, Clause 5, is accepted as a suitable basis for the interpretation and analysis of the test results, the distribution of which is approximately normal.
1.5 The basic method, as described in this document, (usually) estimates the precision of a measurement method:
a) when it is required to determine the repeatability and reproducibility standard deviations as defined in ISO 5725-1;
b) when the materials to be used are homogeneous, or when the effects of heterogeneity can be included in the precision values; and
c) when the use of a balanced uniform-level layout is acceptable.
1.6 The same approach can be used to make a preliminary estimate of precision for measurement methods which have not reached standardization or are not in routine use.
Base documents: ISO 5725-2:2019
Replaced: EVS-ISO 5725-2:2026